Jeff Hostetler <g...@jeffhostetler.com> writes: > In my brief testing, the existing porcelain status reports it as "AM" > (for both a file with content and an empty file). > > The V2 code outputs the following: > 1 AM N... 000000 100644 100644
OK, so they are consistent, which is good. >> Having said all that, it is OK to fix their titles after the current >> 9-patch series lands on 'next'; incremental refinements are easier >> on reviewers than having to review too many rerolls. > > I'll change the test titles to have all that info. OK. As I said, if the retitling is the only change, then doing so as a follow-up to the existing 9-patch series would be easier to review. If there are other changes needed, a reroll of the full set is probably better. >> This is a small point, but doesn't the lowercase 'u' somehow look >> ugly, especially because the status letters that immediately follow >> it are all uppercase? >> > > Since we are inventing a new format and my column 1 is completely new > I didn't think it mattered. Wrong assumption ;-) We want the resulting code to be consistent. > And I used a lowercase 'u' to distinguish > it from the "U" in the X and Y columns since they mean different > things. I thought they both mean "Unmerged"; that is why I thought seeing a lowercase there was very strange. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
