From: "Marc Branchaud" <>
On 2016-08-12 03:07 AM, Philip Oakley wrote:
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <>
Cc: Jakub Narębski <>
 Documentation/revisions.txt | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/revisions.txt b/Documentation/revisions.txt
index 3da0083..0b5044d 100644
--- a/Documentation/revisions.txt
+++ b/Documentation/revisions.txt
@@ -281,7 +281,8 @@ for naming a set that is formed by a commit and its parent commits.

 The 'r1{caret}@' notation means all parents of 'r1'.

-'r1{caret}!' includes commit 'r1' but excludes all of its parents.
+'r1{caret}!' notation includes commit 'r1' but excludes all of its parents.

This sentence should start with "The".

Accepted. I'd simply split the the previous text, so the nice run-on effect it initially had has been lost.

+This is the single commit 'r1', if standalone.

That reads awkwardly to me.  Perhaps

       By itself, this notation denotes the single commit 'r1'.

Like it. I'd toyed wth quite a few variants. It's jsut a case of finding the nicest one;-)




To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to