Hi RĂ©mi,

On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Remi Galan Alfonso wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> writes:
> > diff --git a/t/t1350-config-hooks-path.sh b/t/t1350-config-hooks-path.sh
> > index 5e3fb3a..f1f9aee 100755
> > --- a/t/t1350-config-hooks-path.sh
> > +++ b/t/t1350-config-hooks-path.sh
> > @@ -34,4 +34,10 @@ test_expect_success 'Check that various forms of 
> > specifying core.hooksPath work'
> >          test_cmp expect actual
> >  '
> >  
> > +test_expect_success 'git rev-parse --git-path hooks' '
> > +        git config core.hooksPath .git/custom-hooks &&
> 
> Any reason to not use 'test_config' here?

Yes: consistency. The rest of the script uses `git config`, not
`test_config`.

Ciao,
Dscho

Reply via email to