On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 08:26:26PM +0200, Øystein Walle wrote:
>> In the mean time, however, I have discovered that this conflicts with
>> kn/ref-filter-branch-list in pu. In that topic this specific feature is
>> implemented as well. They incorporate it into %(upstream:track) instead
>> of having a separate "sub-atom" (what's the correct nomenclature, by the
>> way?) more in line with with branch -vv and your idea.
I'm thinking more on the lines of `%(upstream)` being an atom and the
an option under that atom. I like sub-atom though ;)
> Ah, right. I was feeling like this was all vaguely familiar. I think it
> would be better to push forward kn/ref-filter-branch-list. According to
> the last "what's cooking", I think that topic is waiting on more review.
> If you're willing and able to do so, that would be a big help.
It's been waiting for review for a _long_ time now.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html