On 25 August 2016 at 07:56, Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm thinking more on the lines of `%(upstream)` being an atom and the
> `:track` being an option under that atom. I like sub-atom though ;)

On second thought maybe "quark" is better :P

> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote:
>> Ah, right. I was feeling like this was all vaguely familiar. I think
>> it would be better to push forward kn/ref-filter-branch-list.
>> According to the last "what's cooking", I think that topic is waiting
>> on more review. If you're willing and able to do so, that would be a
>> big help.
> It's been waiting for review for a _long_ time now.

To be perfectly honest my C skills and familiarity with the git source
code is not much to speak of. I very much want to take a close look but
I cannot promise anything worth your time...

But if I do find something I'd like to point out should I just reply
directly to the e-mails containing the patches as one usually does even
though they're months old at this point?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to