Lars Schneider <larsxschnei...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On 25 Aug 2016, at 21:17, Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:07 AM, <larsxschnei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> From: Lars Schneider <larsxschnei...@gmail.com>
>>> Generate more interesting large test files
>> How are the large test files more interesting?
>> (interesting in the notion of covering more potential bugs?
>> easier to debug? better to maintain, or just a pleasant read?)
> The old large test file was 1MB of zeros and 1 byte with a one, repeated 2048
> Since the filter uses 64k packets we would test a large number of equally
> looking packets.
> That's why I thought the pseudo random content is more interesting.
I guess my real question is why it is not just a single invocation
of test-genrandom that gives you the whole test file; if you are
using 20MB, the simplest would be to grab 20MB out of test-genrandom.
With that hopefully you won't see large number of equally looking