On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Christian Couder
> <christian.cou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> As most of the apply code in builtin/apply.c has been libified by a number of
>> previous commits, it can now be moved to apply.{c,h}, so that more code can
>> use it.
>>
>> Helped-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com>
>> Helped-by: Ramsay Jones <ram...@ramsayjones.plus.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chrisc...@tuxfamily.org>
>> ---
>> apply.c | 4731
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> apply.h | 19 +
>> builtin/apply.c | 4733
>> +------------------------------------------------------
>
> I deduce by roughly the same line count in the .c files, it is just
> moving files over.
> (On my todo list I have an idea how to make reviewing patches like this
> easier.)
Yeah, at one point I used some special options to try to get a smaller
diff, but it got lost along the way.
>> 3 files changed, 4751 insertions(+), 4732 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/apply.c b/apply.c
>> index 2eac3e3..7b96130 100644
>> --- a/apply.c
>> +++ b/apply.c
>> @@ -1,5 +1,23 @@
>> +/*
>> + * apply.c
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) Linus Torvalds, 2005
>
> We're very inconsistent with the intellectual property log.
> Sometimes we have that at the top of a file, sometimes we don't
> and rather point at the git history to find out who touched the code.
> I'd rather use the history instead of having a bunch of copyright lines.
> So maybe consider to drop this introductory comment as a
> {preparatory, follow up} cleanup?
>
> (This is also a nit that doesn't require a reroll on its own)
Yeah, if people are ok with it I may od it in a follow up patch.
