Christian Couder <> writes:

> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Junio C Hamano <> wrote:
>> Christian Couder <> writes:
>>> Highlevel view of the patches in the series
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> This is "part 3" of the full patch series. I am resending only the
>>> last 14 patches of the full series as "part 3", because I don't want
>>> to resend the first 27 patches of v10 nearly as is.
>> Just to make sure, you are sending the first 11 of these 14 exactly
>> as-is, right?  I didn't spot anything different other than 12 and 13
>> that replaced the "alternate index" step from the previous round.
> Yeah, the first 11 of the 14 patches have no change compared to v12.
> I didn't want to create a "part 4" as that could be confusing, and
> sending the first 11 patches gives them another chance to be reviewed
> again.


But most likely, you made sure that those who _could_ review the
first 11 are miniscule minority by omitting the earlier steps before
these 14 patches -- unless they are familiar with them, the first 11
patches are not much use to them.  And those who are familiar have
already seen the first 11, too.  That was why I wondered who the
target audience was when seeing only the last 14, among which 11 of
them were identical to the previous.

Reply via email to