Hi Junio,

On Thu, 8 Sep 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Please give these three patches a common prefix, e.g.
>       regex: -G<pattern> feeds a non NUL-terminated string to regexec() and 
> fails
>         regex: add regexec_buf() that can work on a non NUL-terminated string
>       regex: use regexec_buf()
> or something like that.


> Also I agree with Peff that a test with an embedded NUL would be a
> good thing.

This is something I will leave to somebody else, as it was not my
intention to fix this and I *really* have more pressing things to do right
now... Sorry!


Reply via email to