On Thu, 8 Sep 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Please give these three patches a common prefix, e.g.
> regex: -G<pattern> feeds a non NUL-terminated string to regexec() and
> regex: add regexec_buf() that can work on a non NUL-terminated string
> regex: use regexec_buf()
> or something like that.
> Also I agree with Peff that a test with an embedded NUL would be a
> good thing.
This is something I will leave to somebody else, as it was not my
intention to fix this and I *really* have more pressing things to do right