On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >> I've looked at many hg<->git tools and none satisfy me. Too
> >> complicated, or too slow, or to difficult to setup, etc.
> > The one I merged into Git for Windows (since that is what I install on
> > all my machines even if they run Linux) is rock-solid. It also comes
> > with tests. And it requires a fix I tried to get into git.git (but
> > failed, since I was asked to do much more in addition to what I needed
> > for myself, and I lack the time to address such requests these days).
> Maybe, but who uses it? It's quite a lot of code, and it's quite
> difficult to setup--you would need a non-vanilla version of git.
Okay, so the difficulty of setting it up is because it is not in mainline
> Compare this:
> 32 files changed, 3351 insertions(+), 289 deletions(-)
> To this:
> 1 file changed, 231 insertions(+)
Yeah, and that's also because of the severe lack of tests. And the lack of
possible code-sharing with other remote helpers.
As for who uses it:
> It would be better to work together, but to me the code-styles are way
> too different, the difference between night and day.
Aha. Well, okay, it was an offer to collaborate.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html