Hi Felipe,

On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Without push support, remote-hg is useless to me. Without regression
> > tests proving that it is rock solid, I will not use remote-hg.
> Done and done. My remote-hg now has support for pushing, all in less
> than 500 lines of code. It also manages to pass all 14 of the "extensive
> tests" of your remote-hg. Anything else?

While I think that a lot of effort was duplicated now, and while I am
still interested in less handwaving arguments than "I find the code
bloated", I will compare the performance on both hg and openjdk and if I
do not find any issues, have a look at the code, too.

That will have to wait until I am home in a bit more than a week, though.


P.S.: Sverre's remote-hg does not really handle octopus merges. It is
incomplete. I had a good plan how to complete it (see the msysGit wiki
page about remote-hg) but lacked the time to implement it (the problem is
that hg does not have octopus merges, and we want things to be
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to