On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 04:00:06AM -0700, Kyle J. McKay wrote:

> > Each of those commits[1] needs some minor polish, and as I'm not really
> > that interested in fancy log output myself, I don't plan on working on
> > them further. I was mostly curious just how close we were. But if you'd
> > like to pursue it, feel free to use them as a starting point.
> Those patches are missing some of the features like showing root commits,
> handling two letter initials, showing the weekday, inserting a break where
> needed to avoid parent-child confusion in graph output and properly handling
> Duy's initials. :)

I'm not too surprised. I literally looked at the first screenshot from
your output and thought "surely git can do that with some minor tweaks".
Nor am I surprised that there are cases where the output is funny (99%
of the time I spent on it was tracking down that graph-padding bug).

I have no problem taking this in contrib or whatever, until a point when
Git is capable of doing the same thing itself. I just hoped to trick you
into working on Git. :)


Reply via email to