Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Stefan Beller <sbel...@google.com> writes:
>>> This version adds the actual thread safety,
>>> that is promised in the documentation, however it doesn't add any
>>> i.e. it's a single global lock. But as we do not expect contention, that is
>> Because we have to start _somewhere_, I agree it is a good approach
>> to first try the simplest implementation and then optimize later,
>> but is it an agreed consensus that we do not expect contention?
> I agree on that. Did you mean this is obvious to the reader?
I meant to say that "But as we do not expect" sounded like a
justification for the approach based on an unwarranted assumption
that is not even the list concensus. I do not think it is obvious
to the reader that there is no need to worry about contention.
It all is outside the log message, so as long as readers understand
what we meant from this discussion, that is OK.