Am 13.10.2016 um 16:56 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
You have at least two independent changes relative to Dscho's
version.
(1) Show line breaks more prominently by avoiding "\n\n" and
breaking the string at "\n"; this matches the way how the
result would be displayed more closely to how the source looks
like.
(2) Ignore the usual indentation rule and have messages start at
the left end of the source.
Which one are you saying "makes sense" to? Both?
I guess both can be grouped together into one theme: match the way
the final output and the source code look like.
Yes, that summarizes it pretty well.
I agree with that motivation, but I decided to go about it in a way that
is more in line with the existing source code:
-- snipsnap --
diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
index 8e10bb5..1cf70f7 100644
--- a/sequencer.c
+++ b/sequencer.c
@@ -483,6 +483,20 @@ static char **read_author_script(void)
return env;
}
+static const char staged_changes_advice[] =
+N_("you have staged changes in your working tree\n"
+"If these changes are meant to be squashed into the previous commit, run:\n"
+"\n"
+" git commit --amend %s\n"
+"\n"
+"If they are meant to go into a new commit, run:\n"
+"\n"
+" git commit %s\n"
+"\n"
+"In both cases, once you're done, continue with:\n"
+"\n"
+" git rebase --continue\n");
Much better! Thank you.
-- Hannes
