On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Sverre Rabbelier <srabbel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
>>> I know there was a reason why using UNINTERESTING didn't work
>>> (otherwise we could've used that to start with, instead of needing
>>> Junio's whence solution). I think all refs ended up being marked as
>>> UNINTERESTING or somesuch.
>> True.  Is it be possible to check UNINTERESTING in revs->cmdline
>> before the walk?

It is possible to check in revs->pending, but '^foo master' will mark
them both as UNINTERESTING, and 'master..master' as well, which again,
is what we actually want, because that's how it works in the rest of

> That might work, maybe Dscho remembers why we did not go with that approach.

Because you want 'master..master' to output something, but that's
wrong; it's changing the semantics of commitishes, and you don't need
that to solve this problem.

Felipe Contreras
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to