On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 02:03:30PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Is that a longer way to say that the claim "... is designed as a > book" is false? > > > So I dunno. I really do think "article" is conceptually the most > > appropriate style, but I agree that there are some book-like things > > (like appendices). > > ... Yeah, I should have read forward first before starting to insert > my comments.
To be honest, I'm not sure whether "book" versus "article" was really considered in the original writing. I think we can call it whichever produces the output we find most pleasing. I was mostly just pointing at there are some tradeoffs in the end result in flipping the type. -Peff
