"brian m. carlson" <[email protected]> writes: >> [1] I think we've also traditionally considered asciidoc to be the >> definitive toolchain, and people using asciidoctor are free to >> submit patches to make things work correctly in both places. I'm not >> opposed to changing that attitude, as it seems like asciidoctor is >> faster and more actively maintained these days. But I suspect our >> build chain would need some improvements. Last time I tried building >> with AsciiDoctor it involved a lot manual tweaking of Makefile >> variables. It sounds like Dscho is doing it regularly, though. It >> should probably work out of the box (with something like >> USE_ASCIIDOCTOR=Yes) if we expect people to actually rely on it. > > Yes, that would probably be beneficial. I'll see if I can come up with > some patches based on Dscho's work.
Thanks.
