On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 01:59:31PM -0800, Stefan Beller wrote: > >> This applies to the repo at https://github.com/git/git.github.io > > Thanks. I've applied and pushed, though I'll admit I didn't really read > it carefully for content. A few of the ideas look like they would need > to be aggregated to be big enough for a SoC project, but that can be > fleshed out in future patches (i.e., I don't think we care enough about > history to have people polish and re-roll what are essentially wiki > edits).
Yeah, I wasn't sure if the ideas were meant to also contain microprojects so I wrote down everything that came to mind, that I do not intend to work on myself over the next couple month. > > If you (or anybody interested in working on this) would prefer direct > push access to the git.github.io repo, I'm happy to set that up. Yeah I wouldn't mind direct push access there, then I could fixup what I just sent you, e.g. adding myself as a possible mentor or re-shuffling these ideas. :) > >> If you're looking for a co-admin/mentors, I can help out. > > I may take you up on the co-admin thing. I think it's good to have a > backup, just in case. > > Anything you put on the Ideas page, you should probably be willing to > mentor. We definitely _don't_ want Ideas that don't have a mentor. agreed. > I think in general that each idea should have the possible mentors > listed below it. ok, I can make a patch for that; but pushing seems (slightly) easier than mailing a patch. Thanks, Stefan
