On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote:

> As a rule, I don't see much value in writing a framework that works
> only for one case, that smells more like over-engineering. If we had
> two cases (hg and bzr), then we might be able to know with a modicum
> of certainty what such a framework should have. So I would prefer to
> have two standalone remote-helpers, and _then_ do a framework to
> simplify both, but not before. But that's my personal opinion.
> Now that I have free time, I might be able to spend time writing such
> a proof-of-concept remote-bzr, and a simple framework. But I would be
> concentrated on remote-hg.

Actually, there's no point in that; there's already a git-remote-bzr:


So, what do we need a python framework for?


Felipe Contreras
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to