On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:08:37PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > > > Changing the interface for get_author_ident_from_commit would be a pain, > > but if we just wanted to help filter-branch, we could do something like > > this: > > Yes, that is the direction I was alluding to. > > Callers of get_author_ident_from_commit can also do the same and > avoid rebuilding the same $pick_author_script over and over again, > or get_author_ident_from_commit can do so for its callers.
I don't think get_author_ident_from_commit can do so on demand due to the subshell issue I mentioned. So you'd have to generate the pick script on inclusion of git-sh-setup, whether the includer wants to call the function or not. I wonder if we should simply generate these at build time and store them in the script. I'm also not sure that saving one process invocation is worth spending a lot of thought cycles on. Maybe somebody on Windows could run a filter-branch with the patch I just sent and measure whether it even makes a difference. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
