Lars Schneider <[email protected]> writes: >> On 29 Jun 2017, at 20:34, Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> You seem to have squashed an unrelated "table-driven" clean-up into >> this step. While I think the end result looks good, I would have >> liked to see it as a separate step, either as a preparatory "now we >> are going to add the third one, let's make it table-driven before >> doing so" step, or a follow-up "now we have done everything we >> wanted to do, let's make this clean-up at the end" step. > > I am sorry. That was a misunderstanding - I thought you want to have > this change squashed. > > The "preparatory" patch sounds good! > Would you be OK if I send a v9 with this change?
That would be more than OK. I think we are pretty much ready to hit 'next'. Thanks.
