> On 30 Jun 2017, at 20:19, Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote: > > Lars Schneider <[email protected]> writes: > >>> On 29 Jun 2017, at 20:34, Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> You seem to have squashed an unrelated "table-driven" clean-up into >>> this step. While I think the end result looks good, I would have >>> liked to see it as a separate step, either as a preparatory "now we >>> are going to add the third one, let's make it table-driven before >>> doing so" step, or a follow-up "now we have done everything we >>> wanted to do, let's make this clean-up at the end" step. >> >> I am sorry. That was a misunderstanding - I thought you want to have >> this change squashed. >> >> The "preparatory" patch sounds good! >> Would you be OK if I send a v9 with this change? > > That would be more than OK. I think we are pretty much ready to hit > 'next'.
Done: http://public-inbox.org/git/[email protected]/ My brain is fried already today ... I hope the commit message is OK :) Thanks, Lars
