Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > Prior to this commit, we show both entries with > identical reflog messages. After this commit, we show > only the "comes back" entry. See the update in t3200 > which demonstrates this. > > Arguably either is fine, as the whole double-entry > thing is a bit hacky in the first place. And until a > recent fix, we truncated the traversal in such a case > anyway, which was _definitely_ wrong.
Yeah, I agree that the double-entry thing is a bit hacky and only showing the "comes back" entry makes sense. And with this change, I believe that the display of a rename event will be the same for HEAD's log and the renamed branch's log, despite the underlying entries having a different representation. -- Kyle
