On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 07:31:25PM +0100, Heiko Voigt wrote:
> I would prefer if we could squash all these commits together into
> one since it seems to me one logical step, using the new variable
> for update belongs together with its configuration on
> initialization.

Works for me.  I could also try to rework the patch boundaries if a
monolithic patch is not acceptable.  I agree that the current
documentation assignments are fairly arbitrary.  If I don't hear from
anyone in favor of keeping them separate, v5 will be monolithic.

This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to