Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <> writes:

>> An alternative might be to add a "phoney" bit next to "used" in the
>> cache_tree structure, mark the cache tree as phoney when we skip an
>> entry marked as CE_REMOVE or CE_ITA, and make the postprocessing
>> loop this patch adds aware of that bit, instead of iterating over
>> the index entries; instead, it would recurse the resulting cache
>> tree and invalidate parts of the tree that have subtrees with the
>> "phoney" bit set, or something.
> Yeah, that sounds better.

Did anything happen to this topic after this?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to