On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Junio C Hamano <gits...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> An alternative might be to add a "phoney" bit next to "used" in the
>>> cache_tree structure, mark the cache tree as phoney when we skip an
>>> entry marked as CE_REMOVE or CE_ITA, and make the postprocessing
>>> loop this patch adds aware of that bit, instead of iterating over
>>> the index entries; instead, it would recurse the resulting cache
>>> tree and invalidate parts of the tree that have subtrees with the
>>> "phoney" bit set, or something.
>> Yeah, that sounds better.
> Did anything happen to this topic after this?

Not from my side because I forgot to mark this thread as a todo item
and unsurprisingly forgot about it.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to