Am 02.12.2012 20:09, schrieb W. Trevor King: > Before I get into the details, I'd like to point out that I actually > understand the purpose of `submodule init` now ;). To avoid further > confusion, my current one-line command summaries would be: > > init: mark a submodule as active for future submodule operation > deinit: mark a submodule as inactive for future submodule operation > sync: update remote.<name>.origin in submodules to reflect changes > in .gitmodules or the superproject's remote URL. > > I don't think we disagree on that, we just don't agree on how to > implement it.
Nope, it is already implemented and you are arguing to change the current implementation. To quote from another mail: Am 01.12.2012 18:49, schrieb W. Trevor King: > On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 06:25:17PM +0100, Jens Lehmann wrote: >> What real world problems do we have with the current init/sync that >> this approach would solve? > > I don't have any, ... We don't want to change working code and cause compatibility issues just because we /could/ do things differently, no? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
