On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:19:32AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > In any case, I ended up applying them by editing the patches, and I > should have a good copy in 'pu'. Please double check the result.
Your 'pu' branch looks good to me. Most of the differences with my
initial patch are due to irrelevant context lines. I would change
patch 3 (commit 2f507f9a in 'pu') to use
git config -f .gitmodules submodule."$sm_name".branch "$branch"
^
instead of
git config -f .gitmodules submodule."$sm_path".branch "$branch"
^
to match the nearby changes from 73b0898d.
Trevor
--
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
