On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 3:05 AM, Martin Ågren <martin.ag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 February 2018 at 03:13, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 08:28:10PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>>> I learned SANITIZE=leak today! It not only catches this but also "dst".
>>> Jeff is there any ongoing effort to make the test suite pass with
>>> SANITIZE=leak? My t2038 passed, so I went ahead with the full test
>>> suite and saw so many failures. I did see in your original mails that
>>> you focused on t0000 and t0001 only..
>> Yeah, I did those two scripts to try to prove to myself that the
>> approach was good. But I haven't really pushed it any further.
>> Martin Ågren (cc'd) did some follow-up work, but I think we still have a
>> long way to go.
> Agreed. :-)
Should we mark the test files that pass SANITIZE=leak and run as a sub
testsuite? This way we can start growing it until it covers everything
(unlikely) and make sure people don't break what's already passed.
Of course I don't expect everybody to run this new make target with
SANITIZE=leak. Travis can do that for us and hopefully have some way
to tell git@vger about new breakages.