Phillip Wood <phillip.w...@talktalk.net> writes: > From: Phillip Wood <phillip.w...@dunelm.org.uk> > > When a hunk is skipped by add -i the offsets of subsequent hunks are > not adjusted to account for any missing insertions due to the skipped > hunk. Most of the time this does not matter as apply uses the context > lines to apply the subsequent hunks in the correct place, however in > pathological cases the context lines will match at the now incorrect > offset and the hunk will be applied in the wrong place. The offsets of
Good. The --recount "feature" on the receiving end does not have enough information to do a job as good as the code sitting at the side of producing a patch to be applied, and this goes in the right direction.