On 13/02/18 23:56, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:44:04AM +0000, Phillip Wood wrote:
>> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.w...@dunelm.org.uk>
>> While working on a patch series to stage selected lines from a hunk
>> without having to edit it I got worried that subsequent patches would
>> be applied in the wrong place which lead to this series to correct the
>> offsets of hunks following those that are skipped or edited.
>> Phillip Wood (4):
>>   add -i: add function to format hunk header
>>   t3701: add failing test for pathological context lines
>>   add -p: Adjust offsets of subsequent hunks when one is skipped
>>   add -p: calculate offset delta for edited patches
>>  git-add--interactive.perl  | 93 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>  t/t3701-add-interactive.sh | 30 +++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> This looks reasonably sane to me.  I really like that you managed to
> produce failing tests for this situation.  I know pathological cases
> like this have bit GCC in the past, so it's good that you fixed this.

Thanks Brain, it's interesting to hear that GCC has been bitten in the past

Best Wishes


Reply via email to