On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Derrick Stolee <sto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Add document specifying the binary format for commit graphs. This
> format allows for:
>
> * New versions.
> * New hash functions and hash lengths.
> * Optional extensions.
>
> Basic header information is followed by a binary table of contents
> into "chunks" that include:
>
> * An ordered list of commit object IDs.
> * A 256-entry fanout into that list of OIDs.
> * A list of metadata for the commits.
> * A list of "large edges" to enable octopus merges.
>
> The format automatically includes two parent positions for every
> commit. This favors speed over space, since using only one position
> per commit would cause an extra level of indirection for every merge
> commit. (Octopus merges suffer from this indirection, but they are
> very rare.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dsto...@microsoft.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/technical/commit-graph-format.txt | 90 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/technical/commit-graph-format.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/technical/commit-graph-format.txt 
> b/Documentation/technical/commit-graph-format.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..11b18b5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/technical/commit-graph-format.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
> +Git commit graph format
> +=======================
> +
> +The Git commit graph stores a list of commit OIDs and some associated
> +metadata, including:
> +
> +- The generation number of the commit. Commits with no parents have
> +  generation number 1; commits with parents have generation number
> +  one more than the maximum generation number of its parents. We
> +  reserve zero as special, and can be used to mark a generation
> +  number invalid or as "not computed".
> +
> +- The root tree OID.
> +
> +- The commit date.
> +
> +- The parents of the commit, stored using positional references within
> +  the graph file.
> +
> +== graph-*.graph files have the following format:
> +
> +In order to allow extensions that add extra data to the graph, we organize
> +the body into "chunks" and provide a binary lookup table at the beginning
> +of the body. The header includes certain values, such as number of chunks,
> +hash lengths and types.
> +
> +All 4-byte numbers are in network order.
> +
> +HEADER:
> +
> +  4-byte signature:
> +      The signature is: {'C', 'G', 'P', 'H'}
> +
> +  1-byte version number:
> +      Currently, the only valid version is 1.
> +
> +  1-byte Object Id Version (1 = SHA-1)
> +
> +  1-byte number (C) of "chunks"
> +
> +  1-byte (reserved for later use)

What should clients of today do with it?
* ignore it completely [as they have no idea what it is] or
* throw hands up in the air if it is anything other than 0 ?
  [because clearly we will increment the version
   or have new information in a new chunk instead of just sneaking
   in information here?]

> +CHUNK LOOKUP:
> +
> +  (C + 1) * 12 bytes listing the table of contents for the chunks:
> +      First 4 bytes describe chunk id. Value 0 is a terminating label.
> +      Other 8 bytes provide offset in current file for chunk to start.

offset [in bytes? I could imagine having a larger granularity here,
because chunks don't sound small.]

> +      (Chunks are ordered contiguously in the file, so you can infer
> +      the length using the next chunk position if necessary.)
> +
> +  The remaining data in the body is described one chunk at a time, and
> +  these chunks may be given in any order. Chunks are required unless
> +  otherwise specified.
> +
> +CHUNK DATA:
> +
> +  OID Fanout (ID: {'O', 'I', 'D', 'F'}) (256 * 4 bytes)
> +      The ith entry, F[i], stores the number of OIDs with first
> +      byte at most i. Thus F[255] stores the total
> +      number of commits (N).

[ so in small repos, where there are fewer than 256 objects,
F[i] == F[i+1], for all i'th where there is no object starting with i byte]

> +  OID Lookup (ID: {'O', 'I', 'D', 'L'}) (N * H bytes)
> +      The OIDs for all commits in the graph, sorted in ascending order.
> +
> +  Commit Data (ID: {'C', 'G', 'E', 'T' }) (N * (H + 16) bytes)
> +    * The first H bytes are for the OID of the root tree.
> +    * The next 8 bytes are for the int-ids of the first two parents
> +      of the ith commit. Stores value 0xffffffff if no parent in that
> +      position. If there are more than two parents, the second value
> +      has its most-significant bit on and the other bits store an array
> +      position into the Large Edge List chunk.
> +    * The next 8 bytes store the generation number of the commit and
> +      the commit time in seconds since EPOCH. The generation number
> +      uses the higher 30 bits of the first 4 bytes, while the commit
> +      time uses the 32 bits of the second 4 bytes, along with the lowest
> +      2 bits of the lowest byte, storing the 33rd and 34th bit of the
> +      commit time.
> +
> +  Large Edge List (ID: {'E', 'D', 'G', 'E'}) [Optional]
> +      This list of 4-byte values store the second through nth parents for
> +      all octopus merges. The second parent value in the commit data stores
> +      an array position within this list along with the most-significant bit
> +      on. Starting at that array position, iterate through this list of 
> int-ids
> +      for the parents until reaching a value with the most-significant bit 
> on.
> +      The other bits correspond to the int-id of the last parent.
> +
> +TRAILER:
> +
> +       H-byte HASH-checksum of all of the above.
> +
> --
> 2.7.4

Makes sense so far, I'll read on.
I agree with Junio, that I could read this documentation without
the urge to point out nits. :)

Thanks,
Stefan

Reply via email to