(+cc: bmwill@, who is working on protocol v2)

Dorian Taylor wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2018, at 2:15 PM, Jeff King <p...@peff.net> wrote:

>> Thanks, I agree the document is buggy. Do you want to submit a patch?
> Will this do?

Thanks for writing it.

Do you mind if we forge your sign-off?  (See Documentation/SubmittingPatches
item '(5) Certify your work' for details about what this means.)

> Note I am not sure what the story is behind that `version 1`
> element, whether it's supposed to go before or after the null packet
> or if there should be another null packet or what. Perhaps somebody
> more fluent with the smart protocol can advise.

I believe the 'version 1' goes after the flush-packet.


Reply via email to