On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 6:15 AM, Derrick Stolee <sto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't understand how folding the patches makes the correctness clearer, > since the rename (1/4) is checked by the compiler and the Coccinelle script > (3/4) only works after that rename is complete. > > The only thing I can imagine is that it makes smaller patch emails, since > there is only one large patch instead of two. In this case, I prefer to make > changes that are easier to check by automation (compiler and coccinelle). > I prefer the offloading to automation, too. So I would vouch for keeping it as-is.
