On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Kaartic Sivaraam
> That said, I read the draft and found it good except for two minor issues,
Thanks for your comments!
> 1. I see the following sentence in the "Rebasing merges: a jorney to the
> ultimate solution (Road Clear) (written by Jacob Keller)" article
> "A few examples were tried, but it was proven that the original
> concept did not work, as dropped commits could end up being
> replaid into the merge commits, turning them into "evil"
> I'm not sure if 'replaid' is proper English assuming the past tense of
> replay was intended there (which I think is 'replayed').
I agree and changed it to "replayed".
> 2. I see a minor Markdown syntax issue in the "branch -l: print useful
> info whilst rebasing a non-local branch" article.
> ... reworked his original patch to improve `git branch
> Specifically, in the '--list̀' part. I guess it should be "--list`".
Yeah, it's fixed too.