Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclo...@gmail.com> writes: > So the other half of this patch, the part in git-completion.bash, is > to uncomplete --no- options. When you do "git checkout --<tab>", > instead of displaying all --no- options, this patch simply displays > one item: the --no- prefix. If you do "git checkout --no-<tab>" then > all negative options are displayed. This helps reduce completable > options quite efficiently.
Clever. > Of course life is not that simple, we do have --no- options by default > sometimes (taking priority over the positive form), e.g. "git clone > --no-checkout". Collapsing all --no-options into --no- would be a > regression. > > To avoid it, the order of options --git-completion-helper returns does > matter. The first 4 negative options are not collapsed. Only options > after the 4th are. Extra --no- options are always printed at the end, > after all the --no- defined in struct option, this kinda works. Not > pretty but works. So, the earlier mention of "clone --no-checkout" sounded about not losing this historical practice, but (desirabilty of magic number 4 aside) this "show first handful of --no-foo" feature is not about historical practice but is forward looking, in the sense that you do not mark "important" negated options in the source, which would be a way to handle the histrical "clone --no-checkout", but let the machinery mechanically choose among --no-foo (with the stupid choice criterion "first four are shown"). That allows other commands to have many --no-foo form without overwhelming the choices, but I am not sure if it is much better than a possible alternative of only showing --no-foo for more "important" foo's when show_gitcomp() is asked to list all of things. It would certainly be a more involved solution, that might require an update to the way how the choices are precomputed (you'd end up having to keep a separate "use this list when completing '--no-'" in addition to the normal list). In any case, count this as a vote to support an update in this direction. A quite promising work ;-) Thanks.
