Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Michael Haggerty wants me to trust that cvs2git's analysis stage has > been fixed, but I must say that is a more difficult leap of faith when > two of the most visible things about it are still (a) a conspicuous > instance of interface misdesign, and (b) documentation that is careless and > incomplete.
For what it's worth, I use cvs2git quite often. I've found it to work well and its code to be clear and its developers responsive. But I don't mind if we disagree, and multiple implementations to explore the design space of importers doesn't seem like a terrible outcome. Thanks for your work, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html