Eric S. Raymond wrote:

> Michael Haggerty wants me to trust that cvs2git's analysis stage has
> been fixed, but I must say that is a more difficult leap of faith when
> two of the most visible things about it are still (a) a conspicuous
> instance of interface misdesign, and (b) documentation that is careless and
> incomplete.

For what it's worth, I use cvs2git quite often.  I've found it to work
well and its code to be clear and its developers responsive.  But I
don't mind if we disagree, and multiple implementations to explore the
design space of importers doesn't seem like a terrible outcome.

Thanks for your work,
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to