"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgad...@gmail.com> writes:
> From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> > > The problem solved by the code introduced in this commit goes like this: > given two sets of items, and a cost matrix which says how much it > "costs" to assign any given item of the first set to any given item of > the second, assign all items (except when the sets have different size) > in the cheapest way. > > We use the Jonker-Volgenant algorithm to solve the assignment problem to > answer questions such as: given two different versions of a topic branch > (or iterations of a patch series), what is the best pairing of > commits/patches between the different versions? > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de> > --- Does the "gitgitgadget" thing lie on the Date: e-mail header? Postdating the patch with in-body header is fine, but mailbox tools often use and trust the Date: timestamp when sorting and finding messages etc. so sending a new patch to add linear-assignment.c that is different from what was added 9 weeks ago with "Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018" header can easily cause me to miss that message when I look for things that happened within the past few weeks, for example.
