On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:39:26AM -0700, Nickolai Belakovski wrote: > Thanks for the feedback Peff. I actually agree with all your points. > I'd considered an approach like what you proposed, but rejected it for > the first iteration in an effort to keep scope limited and see what > kind of feedback I'd get overall (like would people even want this?). > This is a much better approach, and also gives a path for listing the > worktree path in the verbose output.
Great. If you go that route, feel free to use whatever bits of my patch are useful. I tested it only by running "for-each-ref" once, so it might need some more help. Definitely tests and documentation at the least. :) -Peff
