Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes: > Alternatively, %(HEAD) could return "*" or "+" depending on whether it's > the current worktree head. That would mildly break an existing format > like: > > %(if)%(HEAD)%(then) *%(color:green)%(end)%(refname) > > since it would start coloring worktree HEADs the same way. It would be > rewritten as: > > %(if:equals=*)%(HEAD)%(then)...real HEAD... > %(else)%(if:equals=+)%(HEAD)%(then)...worktree HEAD... > %(else)...regular ref... > %(end)%(end) > > I think that's perhaps nicer, but I'm not sure we want even such a minor > regression.
I tend to think it is not worth having to worry about it by changing the meaning of %(HEAD) marking to save the effort to find a new token to fill that placeholder. Your %(worktreeHEAD) is good enough, I would think.
