On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 04:25:57PM -0800, Elijah Newren wrote:
> diff --git a/builtin/fast-export.c b/builtin/fast-export.c
> index 2fef00436b..3cc98c31ad 100644
> --- a/builtin/fast-export.c
> +++ b/builtin/fast-export.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static int fake_missing_tagger;
>  static int use_done_feature;
>  static int no_data;
>  static int full_tree;
> +static int reference_excluded_commits;
>  static struct string_list extra_refs = STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP;
>  static struct string_list tag_refs = STRING_LIST_INIT_NODUP;
>  static struct refspec refspecs = REFSPEC_INIT_FETCH;
> @@ -596,7 +597,8 @@ static void handle_commit(struct commit *commit, struct 
> rev_info *rev,
>               message += 2;
>  
>       if (commit->parents &&
> -         get_object_mark(&commit->parents->item->object) != 0 &&
> +         (get_object_mark(&commit->parents->item->object) != 0 ||
> +          reference_excluded_commits) &&
>           !full_tree) {
>               parse_commit_or_die(commit->parents->item);
>               diff_tree_oid(get_commit_tree_oid(commit->parents->item),
> @@ -644,13 +646,21 @@ static void handle_commit(struct commit *commit, struct 
> rev_info *rev,
>       unuse_commit_buffer(commit, commit_buffer);
>  
>       for (i = 0, p = commit->parents; p; p = p->next) {
> -             int mark = get_object_mark(&p->item->object);
> -             if (!mark)
> +             struct object *obj = &p->item->object;
> +             int mark = get_object_mark(obj);
> +
> +             if (!mark && !reference_excluded_commits)
>                       continue;
>               if (i == 0)
> -                     printf("from :%d\n", mark);
> +                     printf("from ");
> +             else
> +                     printf("merge ");
> +             if (mark)
> +                     printf(":%d\n", mark);
>               else
> -                     printf("merge :%d\n", mark);
> +                     printf("%s\n", sha1_to_hex(anonymize ?
> +                                                anonymize_sha1(&obj->oid) :
> +                                                obj->oid.hash));

Since we intend to move away from SHA-1, would this be a good time to
add an anonymize_oid() function, "while at it"?

>               i++;
>       }
>  
> @@ -931,13 +941,22 @@ static void handle_tags_and_duplicates(struct 
> string_list *extras)
>                               /*
>                                * Getting here means we have a commit which
>                                * was excluded by a negative refspec (e.g.
> -                              * fast-export ^master master).  If the user
> +                              * fast-export ^master master).  If we are
> +                              * referencing excluded commits, set the ref
> +                              * to the exact commit.  Otherwise, the user
>                                * wants the branch exported but every commit
> -                              * in its history to be deleted, that sounds
> -                              * like a ref deletion to me.
> +                              * in its history to be deleted, which basically
> +                              * just means deletion of the ref.
>                                */
> -                             printf("reset %s\nfrom %s\n\n",
> -                                    name, sha1_to_hex(null_sha1));
> +                             if (!reference_excluded_commits) {
> +                                     /* delete the ref */
> +                                     printf("reset %s\nfrom %s\n\n",
> +                                            name, sha1_to_hex(null_sha1));
> +                                     continue;
> +                             }
> +                             /* set ref to commit using oid, not mark */
> +                             printf("reset %s\nfrom %s\n\n", name,
> +                                    sha1_to_hex(commit->object.oid.hash));

Please use oid_to_hex(&commit->object.oid) instead.

>                               continue;
>                       }
>  

Reply via email to