David Turner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Let's try this version.

Thanks!

Tested-by: Eric Wong <[email protected]>

Not sure if t1512 would be the best place to put the test, but
having a repo with ambiguous data already at hand was easiest.

---------8<-------
Subject: [PATCH] t1512: test ambiguous cat-file --batch and --batch-output

Test the new "ambiguous" result from cat-file --batch and
--batch-check.  This is in t1512 instead of t1006 since
we need a repo with ambiguous object_id names.

Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <[email protected]>
---
 t/t1512-rev-parse-disambiguation.sh | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/t/t1512-rev-parse-disambiguation.sh 
b/t/t1512-rev-parse-disambiguation.sh
index e4d5b56014..b0819630c9 100755
--- a/t/t1512-rev-parse-disambiguation.sh
+++ b/t/t1512-rev-parse-disambiguation.sh
@@ -388,4 +388,14 @@ test_expect_success C_LOCALE_OUTPUT 'ambiguous commits are 
printed by type first
        done
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'cat-file --batch and --batch-check show ambiguous' '
+       echo "0000 ambiguous" >expect &&
+       echo 0000 | git cat-file --batch-check >actual 2>err &&
+       test_cmp expect actual &&
+       grep hint: err &&
+       echo 0000 | git cat-file --batch >actual 2>err &&
+       test_cmp expect actual &&
+       grep hint: err
+'
+
 test_done
-- 
EW

Reply via email to