Thanks for adding the test.
On Fri, 2019-01-18 at 22:26 +0000, Eric Wong wrote:
> David Turner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Let's try this version.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tested-by: Eric Wong <[email protected]>
>
> Not sure if t1512 would be the best place to put the test, but
> having a repo with ambiguous data already at hand was easiest.
>
> ---------8<-------
> Subject: [PATCH] t1512: test ambiguous cat-file --batch and --batch-
> output
>
> Test the new "ambiguous" result from cat-file --batch and
> --batch-check. This is in t1512 instead of t1006 since
> we need a repo with ambiguous object_id names.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <[email protected]>
> ---
> t/t1512-rev-parse-disambiguation.sh | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/t/t1512-rev-parse-disambiguation.sh b/t/t1512-rev-parse-
> disambiguation.sh
> index e4d5b56014..b0819630c9 100755
> --- a/t/t1512-rev-parse-disambiguation.sh
> +++ b/t/t1512-rev-parse-disambiguation.sh
> @@ -388,4 +388,14 @@ test_expect_success C_LOCALE_OUTPUT 'ambiguous
> commits are printed by type first
> done
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'cat-file --batch and --batch-check show
> ambiguous' '
> + echo "0000 ambiguous" >expect &&
> + echo 0000 | git cat-file --batch-check >actual 2>err &&
> + test_cmp expect actual &&
> + grep hint: err &&
> + echo 0000 | git cat-file --batch >actual 2>err &&
> + test_cmp expect actual &&
> + grep hint: err
> +'
> +
> test_done
