On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 at 21:02, Rohit Ashiwal <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey! > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:22 AM Johannes Schindelin > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > We already have `test_path_is_missing`. Why not use that instead of `! > > test -d` or `! test -f`? > > > > Yes, I think this is better. It will satisfy all the requirements I guess.
Good suggestion, Johannes. That is probably what most (all) of these wanted to express. Martin
