Ramkumar Ramachandra <artag...@gmail.com> writes: > Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: >> >>> And yes, a regular `git push origin refs/for/master` is just retarded. >> >> The usual incantation is "git push gerrit HEAD:refs/for/master". Is >> the code review creation push that uses a different branchname from >> the branch the integrator pulls what seems backward, or is it the need >> to specify a refname at all on the command line? > > How else would you design a system to differentiate between a > push-for-review, and push-to-update-ref?
You don't have to. If the reviewed result is merged on the server side and appear on 'master', nobody has to push to update refs/heads/master. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
