Ramkumar Ramachandra <artag...@gmail.com> writes:

> Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>>> And yes, a regular `git push origin refs/for/master` is just retarded.
>> The usual incantation is "git push gerrit HEAD:refs/for/master".  Is
>> the code review creation push that uses a different branchname from
>> the branch the integrator pulls what seems backward, or is it the need
>> to specify a refname at all on the command line?
> How else would you design a system to differentiate between a
> push-for-review, and push-to-update-ref?

You don't have to.

If the reviewed result is merged on the server side and appear on
'master', nobody has to push to update refs/heads/master.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to