Hi Junio, On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 10:26:53AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * dl/complete-cherry-pick-revert-skip (2019-08-27) 3 commits > - status: mention --skip for revert and cherry-pick > - completion: add --skip for cherry-pick and revert > - completion: merge options for cherry-pick and revert > > The command line completion support (in contrib/) learned about the > "--skip" option of "git revert" and "git cherry-pick". > > Will merge to 'next'.
Did we end up deciding whether or not we were going to drop "status: mention --skip for revert and cherry-pick"? > > * dl/use-sq-from-test-lib (2019-09-06) 1 commit > - t: use common $SQ variable > > Code cleanup. > > Will merge to 'next'. This needs a tiny update to its commit message: we should change `git grep =\\\\\'` to `git grep =\\\\\' t/`. > * dl/format-patch-cover-letter-subject (2019-09-05) 1 commit > - format-patch: learn --infer-cover-subject option > (this branch uses dl/format-patch-doc-test-cleanup.) > > "git format-patch --cover-letter" learned to optionally use the > first paragraph (typically a single-liner) of branch.*.description > as the subject of the cover letter. > > Reroll with a redesign with less emphasis on "subject" coming? Correct, I'll wait for the format-patch cleanup stuff to settle down before sending the reroll in. > * dl/remote-save-to-push (2018-12-11) 1 commit > - remote: add --save-to-push option to git remote set-url > > "git remote set-url" learned a new option that moves existing value > of the URL field to pushURL field of the remote before replacing > the URL field with a new value. > > Anybody who wants to champion this topic? > I am personally not yet quite convinced if this is worth pursuing. Perhaps it's time to drop this topic? Thanks, Denton