Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  <pclo...@gmail.com> writes:

> strncmp is provided length information which could be taken advantage
> by the underlying implementation.

I may be missing something fundamental, but I somehow find the above
does not make any sense.

strcmp(a, b) has to pay attention to NUL in these strings and stop
comparison.  strncmp(a, b, n) not only has to pay the same attention
to NUL in the strings, but also needs to stop comparing at n bytes.

In what situation can the latter take advantage of that extra thing
that it needs to keep track of and operate faster, when n is the
length of shorter of the two strings?

> diff --git a/dir.c b/dir.c
> index 9960a37..46b24db 100644
> --- a/dir.c
> +++ b/dir.c
> @@ -610,12 +610,14 @@ int match_basename(const char *basename, int 
> basenamelen,
>                  int flags)
>  {
>       if (prefix == patternlen) {
> -             if (!strcmp_icase(pattern, basename))
> +             if (patternlen == basenamelen &&
> +                 !strncmp_icase(pattern, basename, patternlen))
>                       return 1;

What happens if you replace this with

                if (patternlen == baselen &&
                    !strcmp_icase(pattern, basename, patternlen))

and drop the other hunk and run the benchmark again?

>       } else if (flags & EXC_FLAG_ENDSWITH) {
>               if (patternlen - 1 <= basenamelen &&
> -                 !strcmp_icase(pattern + 1,
> -                               basename + basenamelen - patternlen + 1))
> +                 !strncmp_icase(pattern + 1,
> +                                basename + basenamelen - patternlen + 1,
> +                                patternlen - 1))
>                       return 1;
>       } else {
>               if (fnmatch_icase(pattern, basename, 0) == 0)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to