Thomas Rast <> writes:

>> Even though I am moving from builtin/blame.c to line-log.c?  I would
>> otherwise have to call from a rather lib-ish file into a "front
> You haven't sent any reply to this.  Does that mean you agree?  Would
> you prefer the shared file to be named something like line-range.c?

The latter, or if you do not want a churn, not moving it out of
blame.c at all.

Because "log -L" does not play well with other patch options, from
the end-user's perspective, even though may does not have cmd_logL()
entry point, I do not think line-log.c is any more library-ish than
cmd_log() or cmd_blame().
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to