Jonathan Nieder <> writes:

> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>> I'd really to have that final 'git continue' in Git 2.0.  Can someone
>> attempt to break up the migration path into manageable logical steps
>> that we can start working on?
> Is there any deadline or migration path needed?  Depending on the
> design, it might be possible to do without backward-incompatible
> changes, meaning the migration path is "whatever someone feels like
> implementing first lands first".

FWIW, I am not convinced yet why we would even want "git continue"
in the first place, so I won't be the one who would be suggesting a
migration path.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to