Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>>> I'd really to have that final 'git continue' in Git 2.0.  Can someone
>>> attempt to break up the migration path into manageable logical steps
>>> that we can start working on?
>> Is there any deadline or migration path needed?  Depending on the
>> design, it might be possible to do without backward-incompatible
>> changes, meaning the migration path is "whatever someone feels like
>> implementing first lands first".
> FWIW, I am not convinced yet why we would even want "git continue"
> in the first place, so I won't be the one who would be suggesting a
> migration path.

Okay, I'm confused now.  You were the one who suggested a unified "git
continue" in the first place, if my memory serves me right.  Why are
you doubting it now?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to